Unsupported browser

For a better experience, please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

New temporary works guidance considered following industry alert

The Temporary Works Forum is reported to be considering issues new guidance following an alert by the Confidential Reporting on Structural Safety (Cross) on the use of props on large excavations.

According to Cross, it received a report concerning the design of propping to large excavations and particularly about the design of the connections for a raking prop to a horizontal waler.

Cross said that the reporter said that they found standard guidance confusing and that opinions from other engineers differ. The reporter called for authoritative and detailed guidance for temporary works design.

Cross stated that the only useful guidance the reporter found is CIRIA C517, Temporary propping of deep excavations - guidance on design (1999).

The reporter said: “The raking prop is shown as meeting the centreline of the waler at the outer flange (the inner flange being fixed to a vertical soldier beam, which is assumed could equally be a sheet-piled wall or a contiguous piled wall).

“An inclined ‘kicker’ or ‘spur brace’ is provided, presumably to resist the upwards component of the prop force which has to be resisted where the prop joins the outer flange. The idea is presumably that the horizontal force component from the prop force passes into the waler web and then along the waler to resist the horizontal forces from the soil.

“Unfortunately, when the forces at the top of the prop are resolved, if the kicker is to resist the vertical force, its axial force must be similar to the prop force, unless it is extremely steep; in fact, it is usually approximately in line with the prop.

“This means (resolving forces) that the prop force passes up through the kicker to where the kicker meets the wall - and the waler doesn’t spread the horizontal prop force along the wall.

“There may be an alternative way of looking at this, where the soil forces travel along the waler, back into the wall at the back of the waler local to the prop, up through the wall to where the kicker meets the wall, hence into the kicker and down to the prop. However, proving such a load path would be difficult; the local wall stressing and the connections would need very close examination.”

The reporter told Cross that they had shown this to several temporary works designers. “Some of them already know about the problem but some just can’t see what the problem is,” the reporter said. “Solutions identified so far (and used) are to either have a near-vertical kicker (or tie-down underneath), then checking that this force can be resisted vertically, or to join the prop at the inner flange, not at the outer flange, which requires some overhead welding on site.”

Cross commented: “If forces from adjoining members do not meet at a point, then a moment will be

induced and in this case the forces must be resolved to eliminate torsion on the waling.

“If the junction between prop and waler beam is an assumed pin, then the system can be a structure with the eccentric vertical component of the prop creating bending in the piling (just below the waler fixing point).

“Alternatively, if the prop to waler junction is assumed to be fixed, the bending will be shared between the waler and the piling. This could only work if the piling/raker have adequate bending capacity.

“The reporter is correct in that, while the inclusion of a kicker provides a load path for the vertical force component of the raking prop, the horizontal force component of the raking prop will also pass through the kicker if it is aligned with the raking prop. In this case, the waler beam will not spread the prop force along the wall.

“This issue can be resolved through good detailing, which could include aligning the raking prop with the inner flange of the waler. However, tolerances should always be allowed for, particularly for sheet pile walls where there can be packing between the sheet pile wall and the waler beam, so there can still be a moment. To overcome any torsional effects, stiffeners can be effective.”

Cross said it is looking for industry feedback and reports on this issue.

Want to read more? Subscribe to GE’s enewsletters and follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn

 

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.