Unsupported browser

For a better experience, please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

No light at the end of flooded tunnel row

Queensbury Tunnel

A row over the cost of abandoning a disused flooded rail tunnel in West Yorkshire continues as the costs rise.

The cost of abandoning a disused railway tunnel in West Yorkshire has risen to more than £4M as a result of logistical difficulties caused by flooding, a campaign group has claimed.

The Queensbury Tunnel Society which is campaigning to keep the disused 2.3km tunnel open, have for the past five years said that it could be part of a cycle network linking Bradford and Keighley to Halifax.

But the society is arguing that Highways England’s Historical Railway Estate (HRE), which manages the tunnel for the Department for Transport (DfT), wants to permanently close it because of it is a threat to public safety.

Queensbury Tunnel

Queensbury Tunnel

Source: Forgotten Relics

Severe defects and a partial collapse within the exclusion zone close to the tunnel’s midpoint.

The abandonment scheme - which is expected to involve infilling around 15% of the tunnel - requires planning permission and was originally costed at £2.7M in February 2016. This rose to £7M based on plans submitted to Bradford Council last May, but the specification was then changed to use cheaper materials, reducing that figure to £3.6M, according the society.

Preparatory works to strengthen parts of the tunnel’s lining are currently underway, but it was intended that these would be restricted to sections at both ends. However, over the past four months, the southern half of the tunnel has been inundated by an estimated 30M litres of water.

The society said that Highways England failed to pay two annual rent payments of £50 for land on which a pumping station is sited, resulting in the equipment being switched-off by the landowner.

To complete the strengthening works, the contractor has installed a new pump and now has to establish a safe access route through a 300m long section near the tunnel’s midpoint which was previously designated as an exclusion zone due to the severe defects within it. Together with the dewatering operation, this work will add more than £400,000 to the bill, the society added.

Queensbury Tunnel

Queensbury Tunnel

Source: Four by Three

Workers at the north end of Queensbury Tunnel.

Queensbury Tunnel Society engineering co-ordinator Graeme Bickerdike said: “HRE has lost control of this project, largely through its own failings. The public will receive no benefit from abandonment, but the financial burden placed on its shoulders is becoming heavier. Perversely, £1M is currently being spent improving the tunnel’s condition before a further £3M is wasted on a partial infilling scheme. It’s becoming an implausible farce.”

A Highways England spokesperson, quoted in the Halifax Courier has disputed the £4M figure, saying it is actually £3.6M, and says the £7m figure is also incorrect. “The safety of the community and our contractors is paramount and the Department for Transport, the owners of the tunnel, agree that safety work to reduce the risk to the community around Queensbury Tunnel should be undertaken as soon as possible.

”We’re working with Bradford Council on the preparation of the planning application for Phase 2 of our safety work. It’s not expected that a final decision on the application will now be reached until spring 2019.

“Phase one of the proposed work has started and involves partial strengthening of the most vulnerable areas of the tunnel which will also provide a safe working area throughout the tunnel for any future work undertaken.

“Delivery of phase one has been made more difficult by the recent diversion of water from Strines Beck into the already flooded southern portal. This has directly increased the water levels within the tunnel and the safety risks to our contactors and potentially to the integrity of the tunnel.

“Our earlier decision to discharge water from the northern section of the tunnel into the existing tunnel drainage system has allowed our contractors to reduce the impact of this additional inflow of water.

“We understand Bradford Council is considering a potential transfer of the tunnel so it could be re-opened and used as a local sustainable transport corridor. Any such transfer could be quickly achieved. Works undertaken during phase one of the safety works are not prejudicial to any plans to reopen the tunnel.”

Queensbury Tunnel Society leader Norah McWilliam said: “Shortly, we expect HRE to ask Bradford Council for permission to progress abandonment. Most of the tunnel beneath Queensbury would be left to collapse. HRE hopes that the tunnel is so deep that the 440 dwellings within its zone of influence would not be affected by any collapse, but how can we have confidence in their assessment of the complex risks when they prove persistently incapable to doing the basics competently?”

According to the society, for the cycle path proposal to go ahead, the tunnel’s ownership would have to be transferred to Bradford Council, for which it would receive a £3M dowry. Funding is currently being sought for a feasibility study into the issues associated with the tunnel’s reopening, whilst the Council’s executive committee is expected to consider the Victorian structure’s future at a meeting in February.

Want to read more? Subscribe to GE’s enewsletters and follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn

 

 

 

 

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.