Unsupported browser

For a better experience, please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Question more says new ICE president Sir John Armitt

Incoming Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) president Sir John Armitt has said that UK has become lost in the “what” and “how” when it comes to infrastructure but does not spend long enough considering the “why”.

The former Olympic Delivery Authority chair and commissioner on the recently established National Infrastructure Commission made the statement as part of his presidential address at the ICE last night as he took office.

Sir John said that in the face of conflicting political and public views, lack of funds, skills shortages and growing demands on infrastructure, it was time to start asking “why” when it comes to decision making.

Why do we need this project? Why one project over alternatives? Why is this 70 year solution more appropriate, or will a 20 year solution suffice - and can we make better use of existing infrastructure. What are the benefits, risks and opportunities of each?” he said.

“When faced with tough choices, government, industry, investors and the public alike should always start by asking ‘why’. This will ensure choices are strategic, and that public and private money, charges to customers, and investors’ funds are used for best collective benefit.”

Sir John welcomed government’s adoption of a National Infrastructure Commission, which he recommended in his 2013 Infrastructure Review, and said he was delighted to be appointed as a commissioner.

“The public pay for infrastructure – either as taxpayers, shareholders or customers of utilities – they are the end users of it, and are impacted by its construction. As a result, politicians are ultimately held to account by the voter and are bound to interfere for good and bad. We cannot change this.

“But we need a mechanism which provides dispassionate analysis of our long-term infrastructure needs and acts as a catalyst for reaching consensus on those needs. The effects of achieving consensus cannot be overstated – it could enable the kind of infrastructure revolution not seen since our great forebears in the 19th Century. I am pleased to see cross party support for a commission, and to be part of something I have advocated and believe in.” he said.

He added that engineers, working with other professions, have a responsibility to help decision makers answer the “how”, “what” and “why” questions, and ensure the commission’s choices are based on independent, expert evidence.

Sir John also announced that the ICE will lead a coalition of business, academic, environment and industry experts to produce a National Needs Assessment which will feed into the commission and underpin its work.

The National Needs Assessment, to be published in autumn 2016, will draw from data, analysis, open consultations and evidence hearings, and set out what we are likely to need from our infrastructure up to 2050, considering factors such as climate change and population growth. It will then set out different options for meeting those needs, and will be designed to inform both national and regional infrastructure plans.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.