Unsupported browser

For a better experience, please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Letter: CDM confusion continues

Following my recent Talking Point on CDM 2015 and the implications for site investigation, I have managed to obtain feedback from an ex-HSE inspector and various health and safety professionals. There appears to be a difference of opinion as to whether CDM applies to ground investigation work, but as yet none of the opinions have been case tested.

The health and safety professionals typically tend towards site investigation being construction work and would recommend that it falls under CDM2015; in some instances this has also included archaeological works, which are specifically excluded from CDM. However, from the point of view of the ex-HSE inspector, it has been advised that unless the investigation is linked to definite construction work, CDM would not be considered to apply. Therefore investigation for due diligence, pre-planning, feasibility and Part 2A and similar would not necessarily fall under CDM.  However, there is still a judgement call to be made and, regardless of CDM, serious implications of not implementing appropriate risk management procedures remain.

Jo Strange, regional director, CGL


Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.