Unsupported browser

For a better experience, please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

FPS blog: The need for better site investigation

Few would argue that effective site investigation is not only best practice but essential for identifying ground conditions that may have the potential to impact negatively during the proceeding construction phase of any project.

phil hines pr shot

phil hines pr shot

Phil Hines is chairman of the Federation of Piling Specialist, as well as managing director of Soletanche Bachy UK

It is also widely accepted that any failure to identify ground issues often results in unforeseen costs to the project, as well as that all too familiar issue of late completions. However, what is often overlooked is site investigation’s ability to actually save money, as any subsequent ground engineering work, such as piling, can be effectively matched to the ground conditions and not guessed at or “over engineered” to simply avoid unknow future issues.

Despite the proven cost-effectiveness of undertaking a proper site investigation and the many compelling arguments to support it too, members of the Federation of Piling Specialists (FPS) are reporting that increasingly the quality of site investigation data they are being provided with is still often well below the standard required to produce an economical pile design.

Poor site investigation information is almost worthless when it comes to designing a cost-effective piling solution and too often assumptions are being made, which maybe conservative, therefore leading to an over engineered solution or optimistic leading to issues during construction, resulting in delays and claims. Optimistic solutions may appear attractive at the project outset but generally lead to higher client costs.

Typically testing carried out during site investigations is the cheapest onsite testing rather than more accurate laboratory testing. This provides information that varies widely and can be open to different interpretation. The technique for undertaking investigations is also too often driven by cost rather than ground conditions. This leads to poor sample recovery or inaccurate ground water information. Quite simply, clients are still under-investing in site investigation in order to save money without considering the bigger picture and the benefits quality site investigation data can add to a project.

The FPS is currently quantifying the quality of site investigation typically received, with a view to producing clear concise guidance on minimum site investigation information required for effective piling solutions.

For piling contractors, having access to high-quality site investigation data at the right time in the project development can mean certainty in reduction in pile size, a reduction in concrete use and even less time on-site, which beyond the obvious economic savings can also bring environmental benefits too – a win–win scenario.

Transmitting the correct site investigation information is also critical. Nearly all site investigation information is recorded in AGS format, however, this information rarely gets communicated through project supply chains in a timely manner. AGS data allows large amounts of site investigation data to be quickly analysed and assessed. It is critical to ensure this information flows through the project supply chain and forms part of the project digital data set. With the development of BIM and digital data management on projects this should allow a step change in communicating AGS data.

Construction companies all boast about the need for quality and how much value they place on this over straight cost, yet the reality is often what specialist contractors, such as piling, face on almost all projects is lowest cost wins. While saving a few pounds up-front, clients skimping on site investigations it increases project costs and, in some cases, even putting the projects entire viability at risk.

It is time that all clients fully realise the benefits of procuring proper and thorough site investigations.

The standards are there, laid out clearly and endorsed by organisations such as the Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists and British Drilling Association and, as an industry, we must all lobby hard to ensure we arrive on site in receipt of meaningful site investigation data that allows us to do our job effectively, for the good of all and cost effectively.

  • Phil Hines is chairman of the Federation of Piling Specialist, as well as managing director of Soletanche Bachy UK

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.