Unsupported browser

For a better experience, please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Technical paper: Monitoring of soil stiffness during ground improvement using seismic surface waves

A L Moxhay, ground improvement consultant, R D Tinsley, geotechnical services manager, Campion & Partners, and JA Sutton, geotechnical engineer, GDS Instruments. This paper was first published in GE’s January 2001 edition.

Abstract

The continuous surface wave (CSW) technique relies on the propagation properties of vertically polarised seismic surface waves, or Rayleigh waves. Surface waves have depths of penetration related empirically to their wavelength and hence frequency. Surface wave velocity is determined over a range of frequencies and used to calculate the variation in soil stiffness with depth. The nature of the propagation of seismic waves dictates that the stiffness calculated is the maximum value occurring at very small strain (<0.001%). At such strain levels most soils are believed to behave elastically, as a result of which stiffness is independent of strain (Matthews et al, 1996).

The introduction of ground improvement techniques such as vibro and dynamic compaction has led to different methods of monitoring and quality control being used with varying degrees of success. Despite the wide range of testing available, none is ideally suited to the huge variation in grain size found in the semi-cohesive superficial deposits that predominate as overburden throughout the UK. The coarse nature of such material often militates against invasive testing methods such as continuous cone penetration or pressuremeter testing.

Surface wave testing, being non-intrusive, does not suffer the same disadvantages. Following extensive trials carried out on numerous sites, clear evidence of stiffness improvement after treatment is beginning to emerge as illustrated in this paper by case studies. 

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.